Miners Savings Bank v. Naylor
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Parker,
This is a suit in assumpsit on a promissory note which contained a material alteration. The case was called for trial before a jury and, after plaintiff had produced his proofs and made certain offers, a compulsory nonsuit was entered. The appeal, which was taken from a refusal to take off the nonsuit, raises questions of pleading and procedure.
The plaintiff set forth in its statement of claim a copy of a promissory note of this tenor: “Scranton, Pa., Sept. 2, 1931. On demand after date for value received I promise to pay to the order of ourselves $35000°%oo. The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Goldberg v. FriedrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Rutherford Water Co. v. Harrisburg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Trabue v. WalshSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Borough v. KennedySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Bata v. Central-Penn National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Kilian v. Allegheny County DistributorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Yentzer v. Taylor Wine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Esso Standard Oil Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.