Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western Railway
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. MURPHY, Chief Judge.
In this diversity-action plaintiffs seek to recover for property damages and in juries sustained in a grade crossing accident. Pennsylvania law determines the substantive rights and obligations of the parties. Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 1938, 304 U.S. 64, at page 78, 58 S.Ct. 817, at page 822, 82 L.Ed. 1188, and see Smith v. Piper Aircraft Corp., D.C.M.D. Pa.1955, 18 F.R.D. 169, at pages 171-175. Suits for personal injuries must be brought within two years; Act of 1895, June 24, P.L. 236, § 2, 12 P.S.Pa. § 34; do, suits by a husband for injuries to his wife. Black v.…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sartor v. Arkansas Natural Gas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. KinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Finn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Saracina v. CotoiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Roldan v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Lomax Ex Rel. Lomax v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
- Meredith v. United Air LinesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1966
- Seamans v. WalgrenWashington Supreme Court · 1973
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.