Legal Opinion

Radel v. Seib

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 10, 1931No. Appeal 434PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case, arising under the Act of June 2, 1915, P. L. 736. A claim petition was filed by Samuel Radel, the father and next friend of Isadore Radel, a minor, on August 21, 1929', against E. P. Rickly and Company. An answer was filed by E. P. Rickly and Company, through its insurance carrier, Aetna Life Insurance Company, and a petition to intervene by the latter.

The claim petition alleged- that the minor was employed by E. P. Rickly and Company, and sustained injuries to his left eye on August 23, 1928, which resulted substantially in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Girardi v. Laquin Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. McGinnis v. Valvoline Oil Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. Lincoln v. National Tube Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  5. White Co. v. Fayette Automobile Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. KaufholdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  2. Miners Savings Bank v. NaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Barrilo v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Cease v. Thomas, Exrx.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Brown v. Travelers Insurance Companies, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API