Legal Opinion

Dress v. Schuylkill Railway Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 10, 1924No. Appeal, 216PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

This -appeal brings up two contentions: 1st, that amendment of the record correcting a mistake in name, made appellant a defendant after the period of limitation had run; 2d, that there is no evidence of defendant’s negligence.

1. Plaintiff was injured June 19,1919, while a passenger in a car of the Schuylkill Railway Company, a corporation operating an electric street railway in Schuylkill County. A summons was issued June 9,1921, naming as defendant, the Schuylkill County Railway Company, another corporation, although plaintiff’s counsel intended to sue the Schuylkill…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. McGinnis v. Valvoline Oil Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  3. Tonge v. Item Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  4. Fitzgerald's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Coyne v. Lakeside Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Martz v. Miller Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
  2. Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Barrilo v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  4. Radel v. SeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Stauffer v. Isaly Dairy Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API