Dress v. Schuylkill Railway Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Linn, J.,
This -appeal brings up two contentions: 1st, that amendment of the record correcting a mistake in name, made appellant a defendant after the period of limitation had run; 2d, that there is no evidence of defendant’s negligence.
1. Plaintiff was injured June 19,1919, while a passenger in a car of the Schuylkill Railway Company, a corporation operating an electric street railway in Schuylkill County. A summons was issued June 9,1921, naming as defendant, the Schuylkill County Railway Company, another corporation, although plaintiff’s counsel intended to sue the Schuylkill…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wright v. Eureka Tempered Copper Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- McGinnis v. Valvoline Oil Works, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Tonge v. Item Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
- Fitzgerald's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Coyne v. Lakeside Electric Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Martz v. Miller Brothers CompanyDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1965
- Wagner v. New York, Ontario and Western RailwayDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
- Barrilo v. FrankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Radel v. SeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
- Stauffer v. Isaly Dairy Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.