Legal Opinion

People v. Kings County Development Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 5, 1920No. Civ. No. 2142PublishedCited by 25 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Kings County dismissing an action for failure to serve the summons within three years. M. L. Short, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, John T. Jones, C. F. Culver, R. Justin Miller and Wheaton A. Gray for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is a suit in equity and was commenced by the state of California, through its attorney-general, by the filing of a complaint on the twenty-first day of November, 1914, for the purpose of obtaining a decree annuling a patent to certain state lands, the defendant having acquired title to said patent through certain mesne conveyances coming down from the original patentee. The patent in question was issued on November 23, 1904. Summons in the action was issued June 14, 1915, and was served on September 10, 1918. A notice of motion to dismiss the action was served on the' attorney-general on…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Louisiana v. JumelSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Vrooman v. Li Po TaiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. White v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Skelly v. Westminster School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Modoc Land & Livestock Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hocharian v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Gonsalves v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Superior Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Steinbauer v. BondesenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API