Kruger v. Wells Fargo Bank
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
In this case we hold that a bank’s setoff of charge account debts against a depositor’s checking account constitutes private action, not state action, and thus does not succumb to the requirements of procedural due process under the federal Constitution. We also hold that the reach of the due process clause of the state Constitution is insufficient to afford a remedy to depositors. We conclude, however, that a bank may not exercise its right of setoff against deposits which, derived from unemployment and disability benefits, are protected from the claims of creditors.
1.…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Burton v. Wilmington Parking AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by109 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Security Pacific National Bank v. WozabCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Connolly Development, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Granberry v. Islay InvestmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.