Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Auman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 1, 1950No. Civ. 17546PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff in a condemnation action, defendants O’Connell and Livingston appeal.

Facts: Plaintiff filed a complaint in eminent domain on June 18, 1948, at which time a summons was served on the owner of the fee, J. E. Auman. Defendants at the time occupied the premises under a written lease expiring March 31, 1949.

On or about July 25, 1948, plaintiff acquired title to the property which was the subject of the condemnation suit by grant deed from the owner. Thereafter defendants entered into a rental agreement with plaintiff dated August 3, 1948, covering the property…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Signal Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  2. Eckart v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Bank of America NT&SACalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. City of La Mesa v. Tweed & Gambrell Planing MillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. City of Beverly Hills v. AlbrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Town of Los Gatos v. SundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. City of Stockton v. BascouCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API