Town of Los Gatos v. Sund
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
Appellants’ real property was taken by eminent domain. The husband had run a television business on the property. Appellants moved to amend their answer to the city’s complaint to allege damages of these kinds: (1) costs ($5,100) of moving personal property used in the business ; (2) cost of the option to purchase the new site; (3) appraisal fees; (4) architect’s fees on new site; (5) interest and loan fees on the interim financing for the construction of improvements at the new site; (6) additional management costs; (7) increased insurance costs; (8) advertising costs for the new location;…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Sutfin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Parking Authority v. NicovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- City of Mountain View v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.