Legal Opinion

Town of Los Gatos v. Sund

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 1965No. Civ. 21988PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

Appellants’ real property was taken by eminent domain. The husband had run a television business on the property. Appellants moved to amend their answer to the city’s complaint to allege damages of these kinds: (1) costs ($5,100) of moving personal property used in the business ; (2) cost of the option to purchase the new site; (3) appraisal fees; (4) architect’s fees on new site; (5) interest and loan fees on the interim financing for the construction of improvements at the new site; (6) additional management costs; (7) increased insurance costs; (8) advertising costs for the new location;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Monongahela Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. Kimball Laundry Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. Petty Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Breidert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Community Redevelopment Agency v. AbramsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sutfin v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Parking Authority v. NicovichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. City of Mountain View v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API