Legal Opinion
Eckart v. Brown
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 21, 1939No. Civ. 12145PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover the purchase price of shares of stock defendant Helen A. Brown appeals.
The essential facts are:
March 28, 1936, Helen A. Brown entered into an agreement with H. R. MeClintoek, which read thus:
“Los Angeles, California.
“March 28, 1936.
“Mr. H. R. MeClintoek,
“Los Angeles, California.
“Dear Sir:
“This will confirm our oral understanding.
“As soon as Pacific Outdoor Advertising Company issues to me 21,900 shares of its common stock, I will place the same under a voting trust agreement, a copy of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Millard v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
- Goodhue v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
- Smith v. LingelbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
- Conklin v. WoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Porter v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Franck v. J. J. Sugarman-Rudolph Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Davisson v. FaucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. AumanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Fanucchi & Limi Farms v. United Agri ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.