Legal Opinion

Eckart v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 21, 1939No. Civ. 12145PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment in favor of plaintiff after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover the purchase price of shares of stock defendant Helen A. Brown appeals.

The essential facts are:

March 28, 1936, Helen A. Brown entered into an agreement with H. R. MeClintoek, which read thus:

“Los Angeles, California.
“March 28, 1936.
“Mr. H. R. MeClintoek,
“Los Angeles, California.
“Dear Sir:
“This will confirm our oral understanding.
“As soon as Pacific Outdoor Advertising Company issues to me 21,900 shares of its common stock, I will place the same under a voting trust agreement, a copy of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Millard v. GreenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1920
  3. Goodhue v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Smith v. LingelbachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Conklin v. WoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Porter v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Franck v. J. J. Sugarman-Rudolph Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Davisson v. FaucherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. AumanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Fanucchi & Limi Farms v. United Agri ProductsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API