Legal Opinion
City of Beverly Hills v. Albright
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 13, 1960No. Civ. 24589PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
An action in eminent domain was brought by the city of Beverly Hills to condemn and acquire for municipal off-street parking certain improved commercial property referred to herein as Parcel 1, owned by defendant Kathryn Stevens Albright and leased to defendants and appellants herein, Betty B. Jensen and Walter C. Jensen. Other defendants were named in the cause in connection with parcels not here material. Prior to trial, the action against defendant Albright was dismissed, she having entered into a settlement with plaintiff whereby she transferred to it by grant deed of July 1, 1959, all of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. KlinkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- People v. KlopstockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People v. ChurchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. AumanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
3Cited by10 opinions
- Jong Seau Chhour v. Community Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- New Haven Unified School District v. Taco Bell Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1994
- Keller Street Development Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- City of Vista v. FielderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- John G. Waterbury and Marcia L. Waterbury v. T.G. & Y. Stores Company, a Corporation, Blue Corporation, and Does 1-10, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.