City of La Mesa v. Tweed & Gambrell Planing Mill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from a judgment in an eminent domain proceeding involving the taking of a 40-foot strip of land, which was part of a larger parcel belonging to the defendants. By its verdict, the jury found that the market value of the whole parcel was $70,000; the market value of the part proposed to be taken was $10,500; and the severance damage to the remaining property was $47,500. The plaintiff seeks a reversal because of error in instructing the jury; in the admission of testimony; and in refusing to permit the plaintiff to take the whole parcel.
In 1936, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Danskin v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.