Legal Opinion

City of La Mesa v. Tweed & Gambrell Planing Mill

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1956No. Civ. 5426PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal from a judgment in an eminent domain proceeding involving the taking of a 40-foot strip of land, which was part of a larger parcel belonging to the defendants. By its verdict, the jury found that the market value of the whole parcel was $70,000; the market value of the part proposed to be taken was $10,500; and the severance damage to the remaining property was $47,500. The plaintiff seeks a reversal because of error in instructing the jury; in the admission of testimony; and in refusing to permit the plaintiff to take the whole parcel.

In 1936, the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Danskin v. San Diego Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Jones v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  3. City of Los Angeles v. GageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. County of San Diego v. McClurkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Cent. Pac. R.R. v. PearsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. National Advertising Company v. City of Raleigh, North Carolina, Southern Environmental Law Center, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991
  2. Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. United Business Commission v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Hansen Brothers Enterprises, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API