Smith v. State
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. John H. Reagan. The charge was for betting money at, &c.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
The appellant was indicted for playing at a game called Pin Pool. He filed, an affidavit for continuance, which was overruled by the Court, and there was a trial, conviction and judgment, from which he appealed. The only error assigned, is the overruling the motion for a continuance.
The affidavit as to the witness having been duly subpoenaed, seems to have been according to the terms of the statute. He, however, proceeds in his affidavit to allege the facts which he expects to prove by the absent witness, and if such facts constitute no defence to the indictment, the motion was properly…
2Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Hoffman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- State v. BettiUnited States District Court · 1943
- G2, INC. v. Midwest Gaming, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2007
- State v. WeirWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912