Legal Opinion

People v. Clay

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 7, 1964No. Crim. 4374PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, J.

Defendants Ernest L. Clay and Arthur Junior Davis were charged in the first count of an information with burglary (Pen. Code, § 459) and in a second count with grand theft (Pen. Code, §§484-487). A jury found defendants guilty on both counts, finding the degree of burglary under the first count as second degree. (Pen. Code, §§ 460, 1157.) Defendant Clay was sentenced to prison on the first count for the term prescribed by law. The sole appellant herein, he appeals from the judgment of conviction and the sentence entered thereon.

On November 19, 1962, at about 11 a.m. defendant and Davis…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. People v. NewlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. CahanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. WeinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Grismore v. Consolidated Products Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. PrinceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. HigginsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  3. People v. ChaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State v. StuckeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  5. United States v. Richard Cleve BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API