Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Fox
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 1987No. Docket Nos. A033205, A033761PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
—The issue presented on these consolidated appeals is whether law enforcement officials were properly enjoined from preventing the game of pai gow being played at commercial gaming establishments.
Plaintiffs operate licensed gaming clubs in the cities of San Mateo and San Bruno. As of the spring of 1985, 1 the playing of pai gow had either already commenced or was anticipated to begin shortly. In conjunction with these developments, plaintiffs attempted to obtain assurances from local police departments and the District Attorney of San Mateo County that the playing of pai gow…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Continental Baking Co. v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- People v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re HubbardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- IT Corp. v. County of ImperialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hotel Employees & Restaurant Employees International Union v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Bullock v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- State v. TakacsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Western Telcon, Inc. v. California State LotteryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Kelly v. First Astri Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1999
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.