Legal Opinion

Linnastruth v. Mut. Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n

California Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1943No. L. A. 18502PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The plaintiff as beneficiary sued on contracts of accident insurance issued to her husband Frank Linnastruth. The trial court, sitting without a jury, rendered judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff appealed. The facts are without substantial conflict.

All of the transactions and events took place in 1940. On July 17, Linnastruth signed applications for two policies of accident insurance of $1,250 each and paid $13 as the initial premium on each policy. Each application contained the following as the first paragraph: “I, the undersigned, hereby make application to the Mutual Benefit Health…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fageol Truck & Coach Co. v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Goorberg v. the Western Assurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Douglass v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Boyer v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Stark v. Pioneer Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Aerojet-General Corp. v. Transport Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. Rosen v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'n v. Cal-Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Valdez v. Taylor Automobile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API