Sharman v. Continental Insurance
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. E. N. Rector, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This action was brought to recover one thousand five hundred dollars on a fire insurance policy. Plaintiff had judgment and defendant appealed therefrom on the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions.
The district court of appeal for the first appellate district affirmed the judgment and a further hearing was granted by this court.
The execution and delivery of the policy on August 11, 1908, and the destruction of the insured building on April 3, 1909, were facts not disputed. It was further admitted that a written and signed application by plaintiff for the insurance in question stated, among…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Raulet v. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of MilwaukeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Westerfeld v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Iverson v. Metropolitan Life Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- McCollough v. Home Ins. Co. of N.Y.California Supreme Court · 1909
- MacKintosh v. Agricultural Fire Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mayfield v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Golden Gate Motor Transport Co. v. Great American Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
- Madsen v. Maryland Cas. Co. of BaltimoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Connecticut Fire Insurance Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Solomon v. Federal InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.