Legal Opinion
K. C. Working Chemical Co. v. Eureka-Security Fire & Marine Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1947No. Civ. No. 15829PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VALLEE, J. pro tem.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant in an action upon two fire insurance policies. All facts necessary to a recovery, if the policies were in force, were proven by plaintiff or stipulated to. The defense was that the policies were canceled before a fire occurred.
The trial court found that about February 20, 1945, respondent, in consideration of the premium charged therefor, by its agent, issued and delivered to appellant two policies of fire insurance; that the policies were California standard form; that by the policies respondent insured appellant, subject to…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. Young's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Emery v. Pacific Employers InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Duncan v. John Hancock Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- Cleveland Oil Co. v. Norwich Ins. SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1898
- Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co v. Hubbs-Johnson Motor Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Ascherman v. San Francisco Medical SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
- Glens Falls Insurance v. Founders' InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Lowitt & Harry Cohen Insurance Agency, Inc. v. Pearsall Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Granco Steel, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.