Reclamation Board. v. Chambers
California Court of Appeal
APPLICATION for a Writ of Mandate to compel the state controller to draw his warrant in favor of the petitioner. Peremptory writ issued. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
NICOL, P. J., pro tem.
This is an original application for a writ of mandate to compel the respondent as state controller to draw his warrant in favor of the petitioner for the sum of one hundred dollars, payable out of the appropriation of ten thousand dollars made by the act of the legislature, approved May 27, 1919. (Stats. 1919, p. 1209.)
This act was passed, as expressed in section 1 thereof, for the purpose of co-operation in the construction of the public works included in and provided for by that certain project heretofore adopted by the reclamation board, known as Sutter Butte by-pass…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Chapman v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909
- County of Sacramento v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Argyle Dredging Co. v. ChambersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- County of San Diego v. HammondCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- State v. SnyderWyoming Supreme Court · 1923
- County of Los Angeles v. RockholdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. LuehringCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.