Legal Opinion
Golden Gate Bridge & Highway District v. Luehring
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 6, 1970No. Civ. 26995PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CHRISTIAN, J.
The Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District and its directors seek mandate to compel the general manager and auditor of the district to issue warrants for payment of certain surplus revenues of the district to the county governments of the counties comprised within the district, We have concluded that the proposed payments, although purportedly authorized by Statute of 1968, chapter 1366, would be contrary to article XIH, section 25, of the California Constitution. Therefore mandate must be denied.
The Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District was created under authority of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Conlin v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Oakland v. GarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- County of Los Angeles v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Hansen v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Ass'n v. City of RosevilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Kuykendall v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- White v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.