United States v. Curtin
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Homer Ferguson, Judge:
The accused was charged with two specifications which alleged offenses in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892. The first specification alleged that he, in conjunction with others, violated a lawful general regulation (Paragraph 9f, AFFE Circular 141), “by purchasing from various branches of the Army and Air Force Exchange Activities about 8 Leica Cameras, 5 movie cameras, 2 movie projectors, not for his own use or consumption.” The second specification of the Charge alleged a violation of a lawful order issued by a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
- United States v. NoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
- United States v. DownardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
- United States v. HogsettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- United States v. TassosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
- United States v. TinkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. TolkachUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.