Legal Opinion

United States v. Curtin

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided July 3, 1958No. 10,808PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

The accused was charged with two specifications which alleged offenses in violation of Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892. The first specification alleged that he, in conjunction with others, violated a lawful general regulation (Paragraph 9f, AFFE Circular 141), “by purchasing from various branches of the Army and Air Force Exchange Activities about 8 Leica Cameras, 5 movie cameras, 2 movie projectors, not for his own use or consumption.” The second specification of the Charge alleged a violation of a lawful order issued by a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. United States v. VoorheesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  3. United States v. NoeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  4. United States v. DownardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. HogsettUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  2. United States v. TassosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  3. United States v. TinkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  4. United States v. TolkachUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  5. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API