Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Noe

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided November 2, 1956No. 8324PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Homer Ferguson, Judge:

Ship’s Serviceman Seaman Wendell Forrest Noe, United States Navy, was convicted of bigamy, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 50 USC § 728. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, partial forfeitures, confinement at hard labor for six months, and reduction in grade. The convening authority reduced the forfeitures and the confinement at hard labor to two months, “but the execution of that portion thereof adjudging bad conduct discharge is suspended until the accused’s release from confinement or until completion of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Minner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1932
  2. Bird v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  4. Nicola v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1934
  5. United States v. McCluskeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. United States v. CurtinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  2. United States v. MorphisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. GrossoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  4. United States v. SmithUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  5. United States v. ForwerckUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API