Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Baker

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided August 15, 1969No. 21,910PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

DARDEN, Judge:

Baker stands convicted of violating Headquarters, United States Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, Directive 65-50, dated June 11,, 1966, by Unlawfully making monthly purchases of Treasury cheeks in excess of his monthly pay during the period from September 1, 1966, to January 31, 1967. Presently, his sentence consists of confinement at hard labor for fifteen months, total forfeitures, and reduc*506tion to the lowest enlisted grade. This Court is called upon to determine whether the directive in question applied to the accused’s purchase of Treasury checks and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. RoweUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1962
  2. United States v. CurtinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. In Re Plainfield-Union Water Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
  4. Leitzsey v. Columbia Water Power Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  5. McPherson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. BartlettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  2. United States v. GiffordCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2016
  3. United States v. NardellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  4. United States v. BrightU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1985
  5. United States v. BenwayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API