Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Tinker

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided March 20, 1959No. 12,345PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

At trial, the accused pleaded guilty to a specification laid under Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 892, alleging the violation of “a lawful general order.” However, before the board of review he contended the specification fails to set out an offense under Article 92 in that it does not contain an allegation that he had knowledge of the order. See United States v Bunch, 3 USCMA 186, 11 CMR 186. The board of review held the order was a “general order” within the meaning of Article 92(1), supra, and, consequently, it was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SnyderUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952
  2. United States v. CurtinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. BunchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. GrayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  5. United States v. StoneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. BruceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. TassosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1968
  3. United States v. TolkachUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. PorterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  5. United States v. ChunnUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API