Legal Opinion

State v. Meyrick

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1991No. DCR88-13646; CA A61490PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for criminal mischief in the second degree. ORS 164.354. 1 He assigns as error that the court allowed him to represent himself without first ascertaining that his waiver of counsel was intelligent and competent. We reverse.

At defendant’s arraignment, the court and defendant engaged in this colloquy:

“Court: Okay, Mr. Meyrick, the offense of menacing and criminal mischief in the second degree are both Class ‘A’ misdemeanors. They subject you to maximum penalties of one year in the county jail and/or a fine of twenty-five hundred dollars on each of the two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  2. State v. TwittyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. Koller v. SchmaingCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API