State v. Blanchard
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment revoking his probation on a conviction for possession of cocaine. He assigns error to the trial court’s failure to allow him to proceed pro se, contending that the trial court’s determination that he must proceed with court-appointed counsel violated his right to represent himself under Article I, section 11, of the Oregon Constitution, 1 and the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. 2 The state moves to dismiss the appeal on the ground that, defendant having served the sanction imposed for his probation violation, the case is now…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. FredinburgCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- State v. OrtegaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Talley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
- State v. MartineauCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.