Legal Opinion
State v. Boswell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 24, 1988No. 86-1011; CA A45132PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for unauthorized use of a vehicle. ORS 164.135. He contends that the trial court erred in allowing him to represent himself without first finding that he had intelligently and competently waived his right to counsel. The record does not show a valid waiver. Therefore, we reverse and remand.
Defendant was arraigned on January 15, 1987. At that time, the following occurred:
“THE COURT: You have been charged with unauthorized use of a vehicle, alleging that on the 15th of December, 1986, you used an ‘82 Honda Accord without consent of the owner. This is an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- State v. VernaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- State v. GrenvikOregon Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MeyrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.