Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Up-Right, Inc.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1993No. S029708PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PANELLI, J.

We granted review in this case to determine whether Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. (1988) 47 Cal.Sd 654 [254 Cal.Rptr. 211, 765 P.2d 373] (Foley) precludes recovery of tort damages for fraud and deceit predicated on a misrepresentation made to effect termination of employment. Foley made clear that the employment relationship is “fundamentally contractual,” and that—terminations in violation of public policy aside—contract damages are the appropriate remedy for wrongful termination. (Foley, supra, 47 Cal.3d at pp. 665, 696, 699.) We have continuously adhered to that view.…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Egan v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Cates Construction, Inc. v. Talbot PartnersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Freeman & Mills, Inc. v. Belcher Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jenkins v. Boise Cascade Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API