Freeman & Mills, Inc. v. Belcher Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUCAS, C. J.
We granted review in this case to resolve some of the widespread confusion that has arisen regarding the application of our opinion in Seaman’s Direct Buying Service, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co. (1984) 36 Cal.3d 752 [206 Cal.Rptr. 354, 686 P.2d 1158] (Seaman’s). We held in that case that a tort cause of action might lie “when, in addition to breaching the contract, [defendant] seeks to shield itself from liability by denying, in bad faith and without probable cause, that the contract exists.” (Id. at p. 769.)
*88In the present case, the Court of Appeal reversed judgment for…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Comunale v. Traders & General InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1994
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Lazar v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Robinson Helicopter Co., Inc. v. Dana Corp.California Supreme Court · 2004
- Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.