Mono Power Co. v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Albert Lee Stephens, City Attorney, W. B. Mathews, S. B. Robinson, and Wm. B. Himrod, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtChipman, P. J.
The action was to condemn to plaintiff’s use certain land situated in Mono County in which defendant is alleged to have an interest. The complaint was filed January 13,1913, and defendant answered June 28, 1915. Thereafter, defendant gave notice that, on September 1, 1915, it would move for a change of the place of trial from Moño County “to the superior court of such county of the state of California, as the parties to the above-entitled cause may agree upon, by stipulation in writing, or, made in open court, and entered in. the minutes, or, if they do not agree, then the nearest or most…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Matter of Application of MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Cook v. PendergastCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
- Bohn v. BohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Pascoe v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Oakland v. DarbeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Fitzpatrick v. Sonoma CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Nanny v. Ruby Lighting Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Good Roads MacHinery Co. v. Broadwater CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.