Legal Opinion

Good Roads MacHinery Co. v. Broadwater County

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1933No. 7,017PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

This is an action upon a contract entered into by the plaintiffs, respondents here, the Good Roads Machinery Company, and the Midland Implement Company, Inc., as parties of the first part therein, and Broadwater County, Montana, defendant below and appellant here, as party of the second part. By the terms of the contract certain road machinery was sold to Broadwater county for $5,000. Certain deferred payments were to be divided between the machinery and implement companies, and payments were to be made to the one at Great Falls, Cascade county, and to the other at Billings, Yellowstone…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Interstate Lumber Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Smith v. ZimmerMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fitzpatrick v. Sonoma CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Oppenheimer v. ReganMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Mono Power Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Johnson v. City of BillingsMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  2. State Ex Rel. Kesterson v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State Ex Rel. Hendrickson v. Gallatin CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1974
  4. State Ex Rel. Montana Deaconess Hospital v. Park CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Electrical Products Consolidated v. GoldsteinMontana Supreme Court · 1934

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API