Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Fitzpatrick v. Sonoma County

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 16, 1929No. Docket No. 5910PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, J., pro tem.

This action was commenced in the city and county of San Francisco. The cause of action is damage by injury to real property situated in the County of Sonoma, and the abatement of a nuisance therein. This is an appeal from an order denying a motion for change of venue, made “upon the ground that the real property af fected by said action is situated in the County of Sonoma, and for that reason said cause is proper to be tried in said county, and upon the further ground that all of the defendants, other than the County of Sonoma, are residents and live within said County of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. City of Stockton v. EllingwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  3. Wood, Curtis & Co. v. Herman Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Mono Power Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. City of Stockton v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dougherty v. California Kettleman Oil Royalties, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Endresse v. Van VleetMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Smart v. PeekCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Smith v. AddiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Harris v. SeidellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API