Legal Opinion
City of Phoenix v. Beall
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 25, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2422PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINIOÑ
STEVENS, Judge.
The trial court entered a judgment changing a zoning classification as to a particular piece of property. The appellees were the plaintiffs in the trial court. The judgment entered by the trial court recites:
“This matter was tried to the Court, taken under advisement, and legal memoranda by counsel for both parties were submitted and considered:
“NOW THEREFORE the Court declares that:
“1. The denial of plaintiffs’ request for rezoning from R-3 to C-0 bore no real or substantial relation to public health, safety, morals or general welfare and unreasonably deprived…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
- City of Phoenix v. FehlnerArizona Supreme Court · 1961
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. OglesbyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
- Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- McGann v. City Council of City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Tempe v. RasorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Smythe v. Butler TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.