Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Beall

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 25, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2422PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINIOÑ

STEVENS, Judge.

The trial court entered a judgment changing a zoning classification as to a particular piece of property. The appellees were the plaintiffs in the trial court. The judgment entered by the trial court recites:

“This matter was tried to the Court, taken under advisement, and legal memoranda by counsel for both parties were submitted and considered:
“NOW THEREFORE the Court declares that:
“1. The denial of plaintiffs’ request for rezoning from R-3 to C-0 bore no real or substantial relation to public health, safety, morals or general welfare and unreasonably deprived…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  4. City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  5. City of Phoenix v. FehlnerArizona Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. OglesbyArizona Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. McGann v. City Council of City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. City of Tempe v. RasorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  5. Smythe v. Butler TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API