Legal Opinion
Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise Valley
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 26, 1981No. 1 CA-CIV 4470PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EUBANK, Judge.
The main issues raised in this appeal are whether the zoning ordinances of the appellee, Town of Paradise Valley (Town or Town Council), are unconstitutional.
Appellants were denied a special use permit to build a tennis resort by the Town Council. They filed a declaratory judgment action (A.R.S. § 12-1831 et seq.) against the Town in the superior court asking that the ordinances be declared unconstitutional. Following discovery, the Town moved for summary judgment and the trial court granted the Town’s motion. The effect of the judgment is to uphold the constitutionality…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Exton Quarries, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- Aegis of Arizona, L.L.C. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- Redelsperger v. City of AvondaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Corrigan v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Smythe v. Butler TownshipOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.