Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Oglesby

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1975No. 11995PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYS, Justice.

George W. Oglesby and his wife, the appellees, applied to the Planning Commission of the City of Phoenix, the appellant, to change the zoning of land owned by the appellees from a single-family use classification (Rl-6) to a commercial office classification (C-O). The Commission voted to deny the application. Subsequently, the city council heard and denied the application. Oglesby filed a complaint in Superi- or Court seeking an injunction to restrain the city from interfering with the use of the property as a commercial office. A permanent injunction was granted. The city now…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Radice v. People of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. City of Tucson v. Arizona MortuaryArizona Supreme Court · 1928
  4. City of Phoenix v. FehlnerArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Rubi v. 49'er Country Club Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. RANCH 57 v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Wait v. City of ScottsdaleArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  3. City of Tucson v. GrezaffiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Corrigan v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API