City of Tempe v. Rasor
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WREN, Judge.
The question presented on this appeal is whether the trial court erred in overruling a Tempe City Council’s decision that appellees’ property should not be rezoned to allow a commercial use in an area zoned for primary industrial uses. We find that it did.
The parcel of land involved, comprising approximately .77 acres or 37,000 square feet, is situated within a sixty acre industrial park on the north side of Broadway Road, approximately 2,000 feet east of the northeast corner of McClintock Drive and Broadway Road in the City of Tempe.
The industrial park area had at' one…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Pierro v. BaxendaleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Katobimar Realty Co. v. WebsterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dawson Enterprises, Inc. v. Blaine CountyIdaho Supreme Court · 1977
- Outdoor Systems, Inc. v. City of MesaArizona Supreme Court · 1991
- RANCH 57 v. City of YumaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
- Bartolomeo v. Town of Paradise ValleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- Corrigan v. City of ScottsdaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.