Legal Opinion

Vail v. Coffman Engineers, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 4, 1989No. S-2861PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before MATTHEWS, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, BURKE, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ. *213MOORE, Justice.

This appeal addresses the extent of an employer’s obligation to provide a former employee return transportation pursuant to AS 23.10.380(a). The superior court ruled that the employer’s statutory duty was limited to return of the employee to the place of recruitment. We affirm.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In 1982, Coffman Engineers, Inc. (Coff-man), hired James Vail to work in Coff-man’s Anchorage office. Coffman paid the entire cost of moving Vail, his family, pets, household goods and vehicles…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. National Bank of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. HammondAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  4. J & L Diversified Enterprises, Inc. v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Beck v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Alaska General Alarm, Inc. v. GrinnellAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Monzulla v. Voorhees Concrete CuttingAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Smith v. State, Department of CorrectionsAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Fairbanks North Star Borough School District v. NEA-Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API