State v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This appeal raises the question whether a Dalton Highway permittee must indemnify the state for its costs and attorney’s fees incurred in the successful defense of a negligence claim. The superior court ruled that the state is not entitled to indemnification. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Cleofe Freeman, an Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (Alyeska) employee, sued the state when she was injured on the Dalton Highway, alleging that the state negligently failed to control dust on the highway. Freeman v. State, 705 P.2d 918…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Freeman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1985
- Boehl v. Sabre Jet Room, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1960
- Union Oil Co. of California v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
3Cited by14 opinions
- Haole v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Vail v. Coffman Engineers, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Lakosh v. ALASKA DEPT. OF ENVIRON. CONSERV.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
- Citizens for the Preservation of the Kenai River, Inc. v. SheffieldAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.