Legal Opinion

Smith v. State, Department of Corrections

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1994No. S-5336PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MATTHEWS, Justice.

Once prisoners serve their sentences taking into account whatever time credits they have accumulated for good behavior they must be released. 1 Prisoners who have been sentenced to a term of two years or more are released to the custody of the parole board for a period equivalent to their accumulated good behavior time. This is called a mandatory parole release. 2 The parole board imposes standard conditions and, in some cases, supplemental conditions of parole on mandatory parolees. Appellant, Denny Bynum, a mandatory parolee, challenges the regulations and…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Roman v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Doe v. State, Department of Public SafetyAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2010
  4. Dennis O. v. Stephanie O.Alaska Supreme Court · 2017
  5. A. Fred Miller v. PurvisAlaska Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API