Legal Opinion

Alaska General Alarm, Inc. v. Grinnell

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 2000No. S-8318PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

The superior court held that & third-party defendant sued for apportionment of fault under AS 09.17.080 after the statute of limitations on the plaintiff's underlying personal injury claim had run may nonetheless be liable to the plaintiff for money damages. Because we find that the statute of limitations for tort actions does not apply to claims for equitable apportionment, we affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

On June 4, 1998, Cheryl MeIntire, Yvonne Dann, and Morgan Coggswell (hereinafter "Meclntire") were allegedly injured when halon was discharged from…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Lee Houston & Associates, Ltd. v. RacineAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Progressive Insurance Co. v. SimmonsAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  4. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co. v. FrackeltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  5. Benner v. WichmanAlaska Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Alaskans for a Common Language, Inc. v. KritzAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Petrolane Inc. v. RoblesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Barton v. North Slope Borough School DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Laidlaw Transit, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Pagenkopf v. Chatham Electric, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API