Legal Opinion

Monzulla v. Voorhees Concrete Cutting

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2011No. S-13640PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Does the Alaska Workers' Compensation Appeals Commission have subject matter jurisdiction to review interlocutory orders of the Alaska Workers' Compensation Board before a final Board decision? In 2006 the Commission decided that it had implied jurisdiction to hear motions for extraordinary review, which are similar to petitions for review in the appellate courts. In 2008 an employer asked the Commission to review and to stay the Board's non-final order denying a change of venue from Fairbanks. The Commission first issued a partial stay,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State, Department of Highways v. GreenAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Native Village of Elim v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Muller v. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. FyfeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Alaska Airlines, Inc. v. DarrowAlaska Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Huit v. Ashwater Burns, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State, Division of Workers' Compensation v. Titan Enterprises, LLCAlaska Supreme Court · 2014

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API