Legal Opinion

Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. Hammond

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1986No. S-825PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

This case centers around the Department of Community and Regional Affairs’ determination of the “population” of municipalities for state revenue-sharing and tax-limitation purposes. Specifically at issue is the department’s method of counting remote site workers on the North Slope. These workers present a problem because of their unique working situation. Typical work schedules may be one week on, one week off; two on, one off; or four on, two off. Because of the remoteness of the North Slope, employees often reside in other municipalities or even in other states during…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. National Bank of Alaska v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Oceanview Homeowners Ass'n v. Quadrant Construction & EngineeringAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kenai Peninsula Fisherman's Cooperative Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Marathon Oil Co. v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Alaskans for Efficient Government, Inc. v. KnowlesAlaska Supreme Court · 2004

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API