Legal Opinion

Class v. Carter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1982No. 200 126, CA 18302, SC 27724, 27726PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, J.

This case began as an FED action in district court. We draw upon the Court of Appeals opinion for the facts and procedural history:

“* * * Plaintiff Zusman’s predecessors in interest owned land abutting the Columbia Slough and a submerged lands lease in the slough from the state. They leased the premises to defendant Carter, who installed floating moorage facilities and leased spaces to the other defendants and the plaintiffs Class. Zusman purchased the land and took an assignment of the state lease and leased the entire property to the Classes. The sellers, the Classes and Zusman gave Carter…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hunter v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ralph v. LomerWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Phillips v. Port Townsend Lodge, No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Peterson v. KreugerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Meyer v. 4-D Insulation Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  2. Napolski v. ChampneyOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Bunch v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Birchall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Kerr v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API