Legal Opinion

Bunch v. Pearson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 5, 2003No. 99F 002525; A105652PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

In this forcible entry and detainer (FED) action to recover possession of real property, defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff. On appeal, she argues that the circuit court did not have authority under the FED statutes to award possession to plaintiff because title to the property was disputed. We reverse.

Defendant held an equitable interest in the subject property under a land sale contract. In 1983, defendant assigned 90 percent of her interest under the contract to plaintiff, her son. In 1992, the contract vendor transferred legal title to the property to plaintiff by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Schroeder v. WoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Aldrich v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Class v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Purcell v. EdmundsOregon Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Birchall v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  2. Kerr v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Reeves v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  4. Bank of New York Mellon v. LashCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. Bunch v. LowryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API