Legal Opinion

Kerr v. Jones

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 9, 2004No. 02CV4211ET; A120512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment in favor of plaintiff in this forcible entry and detainer (FED) action to recover possession of real property. Defendant argues that the trial court lacked authority under the FED statutes to award possession to plaintiff because defendant acquired title as a co-owner, and, therefore, defendant does not occupy the property as a tenant. We reverse.

Defendant occupies the subject property. He originally took possession of the property as a tenant in common with other persons. In 2000, some of the cotenants filed an action against defendant for partition of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Schroeder v. WoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Aldrich v. ForbesOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Class v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Bunch v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Balboa Apartments v. PatrickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. Bank of New York Mellon v. LashCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  3. Jones v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API