Fry v. DH Overmyer Co., Inc.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.
This is an action for forcible entry and detainer for possession of a warehouse in Washington County for the failure of defendant to pay rent. Defendant was the original owner of the warehouse, but then sold it to plaintiff and leased it back. The court entered judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant appeals. We affirm.
Defendant has assigned 20 errors, and has asked that this court decide the following questions: (1) Was defendant entitled to either abate or continue the action? (2) Was parol evidence admissible to show that this purchase and leaseback was a “hidden loan” transaction? (3) Is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Casey v. Manson Construction & Engineering Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1967
- Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Simmons v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- International Industries, Inc. v. United Mortgage Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1980
- Hazen v. Hospitality Associates Inc. (In Re Hospitality Associates Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · 1980
- Kotera v. Daioh International U.S.A. Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- Oakridge Cablevision, Inc. v. First Interstate BankCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Class v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.