Peterson v. Kreuger
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of Still-water, Jack, J., denying a motion for a new trial. The provisions of G. S. 1894, c. 66, relating to counterclaims that may be interposed in a civil action, have no reference to proceedings under the forcible entry and detainer act.
Read the full summary
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the municipal court of Still-water, Jack, J., denying a motion for a new trial. The provisions of G. S. 1894, c. 66, relating to counterclaims that may be interposed in a civil action, have no reference to proceedings under the forcible entry and detainer act. Phillips v. Port Townsend, 8 Wash. 529, 36 Pac. 476; Ralph v. Lomer, 3 Wash. 401, 28 Pac. 760; Warburton v. Doble, 38 Cal. 619; Kelly v. Teague, 63 Cal. 68; McSloy v. Ryan, 27 Mich. 110; Abrams v. Watson, 59 Ala. 524; People v. Walton, 2 Thomp. & C. 533; Borden v. Sackett, 113 Mass. 214. If a tenant…
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Action by plaintiff, under the provisions of C. S. 1894, § 6118 (the forcible entry and detainer act), to have restitution of certain real property leased by him to defendant Kreuger for hotel purposes, upon the ground that the latter had neglected and refused to pay rent in accordance with the terms of the lease. The only defense made by Kreuger was that he had been partially evicted by plaintiff, by reason of the latter’s failure to repair the roof of the hotel building, whereby some of the rooms had become unfit for use, causing a loss of custom and patronage exceeding in amount the sum…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Every v. OggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- Phillips v. Port Townsend Lodge, No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1894
- Borden v. SackettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Finney v. CistSupreme Court of Missouri · 1863
- Kelly v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by15 opinions
- Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- William Weisman Holding Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Class v. CarterOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Vidger v. NolinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.