Ralph v. Lomer
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Anders, O. J.
On August 13, 1888, the respondent and his wife, who died before the commencement of this action, demised to appellant the premises in controversy *403in this case, for the term of five years, at a monthly rent of f>425 in gold coin of the United States, payable (except the first payment, which was to be made on September 1st) in advance, on the first day of each and every month, at the National Bank of Commerce, in the city of Tacoma. Among others, the lease contains the following stipulation:
“ And it is agreed that if any rent shall be due…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Edgerton v. . PageNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Crommelin v. Thiess & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Goebel v. HoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
- Giles v. . ComstockNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
- Lyman v. MiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Knight v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Hunter v. PorterIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
- Williams v. PittockWashington Supreme Court · 1904
- Income Properties Investment Corp. v. TrefethenWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- Phillips v. Port Townsend Lodge, No. 6Washington Supreme Court · 1894
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.