Legal Opinion

Hyle v. Porter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 2008No. 2006-2187PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoyer, C.J.

{¶ 1} The First District Court of Appeals found its judgment in this case to be in conflict with the judgment of the Second District Court of Appeals in Nasal v. Dover, 169 Ohio App.3d 262, 2006-Ohio-5584, 862 N.E.2d 571, and certified the record to this court for review and final determination. We determined that a conflict exists on the following issue: “Whether R.C. 2950.031 — Ohio’s residency-restriction statute prohibiting certain sexually oriented offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school — can be applied to an offender who had bought his home and committed his offense before…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Doe v. Archdiocese of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. ConsilioOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. LaSalleOhio Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. State v. HudsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API