Legal Opinion

Doe v. Archdiocese of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2006No. Nos. 2005-0702 and 2005-0734PublishedCited by 139 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

{¶ 1} Today this court considers the issue of when a minor who is the victim of sexual abuse must assert claims against the employer of the perpetrator arising from the sexual abuse when at the time of the abuse, the victim knows the identity of the perpetrator, the employer of the perpetrator, and that a battery has occurred. Although we acknowledge the complex emotional issues of plaintiffs who allege that they have been the victims of sexual abuse, we are constrained to follow the law as it exists today, and we must therefore reverse the judgment of the court of appeals in this case.

*492I.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Rotella v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Zumpano v. QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
  5. O'Stricker v. Jim Walter Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by139 opinions

  1. Norman Redwing v. Catholic Bishop for the Diocese of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation v. McKinleyOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. LeRoy v. Allen, Yurasek & MerklinOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Hyle v. PorterOhio Supreme Court · 2008

134 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API