State v. Cook
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
Today we are presented with the questions of whether R.C. 2950.09(B), as applied to conduct prior to the effective date of the statute, is a retroactive law that violates Section 28, Article II of the Ohio Constitution, and whether R.C. Chapter -2950 is an ex post facto law prohibited by Section 10, Article I, United States Constitution. Because we find that R.C. Chapter 2950 is neither impermissibly retroactive nor an ex post facto law, we find that R.C. 2950.09 is constitutional.
I
HISTORY AND OVERVIEW
In the summer of 1994, seven-year-old Megan Kanka was raped and murdered in Hamilton…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Kennedy v. Mendoza-MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by667 opinions
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BodykeOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2011
662 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.